Crocs (NASDAQ:CROX – Get Free Report) and Savers Value Village (NYSE:SVV – Get Free Report) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.
Analyst Recommendations
This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Crocs and Savers Value Village, as reported by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Crocs | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2.27 |
| Savers Value Village | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2.67 |
Crocs presently has a consensus price target of $103.42, indicating a potential upside of 27.88%. Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $13.67, indicating a potential upside of 53.82%. Given Savers Value Village’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Savers Value Village is more favorable than Crocs.
Volatility & Risk
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Crocs and Savers Value Village”s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Crocs | $4.07 billion | 1.08 | $950.07 million | $3.07 | 26.34 |
| Savers Value Village | $1.54 billion | 0.90 | $29.03 million | ($0.01) | -888.50 |
Crocs has higher revenue and earnings than Savers Value Village. Savers Value Village is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crocs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Insider and Institutional Ownership
93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Savers Value Village shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Crocs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Savers Value Village shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Profitability
This table compares Crocs and Savers Value Village’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Crocs | 5.72% | 44.15% | 16.12% |
| Savers Value Village | -0.11% | 9.18% | 2.01% |
Summary
Crocs beats Savers Value Village on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Crocs
Crocs, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women, and children under Crocs and HEYDUDE Brand in the United States and internationally. The company offers various footwear products, including clogs, sandals, slides, flips, wedges, platforms, socks, boots, charms, flip flops, sneakers, and slippers. It sells its products through wholesalers, retail stores, e-commerce sites, third-party marketplaces, and kiosks/store-in-store locations. Crocs, Inc. was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado.
About Savers Value Village
Savers Value Village, Inc. sells second-hand merchandise in retail stores in the United States, Canada, and Australia. It operates stores under the Savers, Value Village, Value Village Boutique, Village des Valeurs, Unique, and 2nd Avenue brands. The company purchases secondhand textiles, including clothing, bedding, and bath items; shoes; accessories; housewares; books; and other goods from non-profit partners and then processes, selects, prices, merchandises, and sells them in its stores. It serves retail and wholesale customers. The company was formerly known as S-Evergreen Holding LLC and changed its name to Savers Value Village, Inc. in January 2022. Savers Value Village, Inc. was founded in 1954 and is based in Bellevue, Washington.
Receive News & Ratings for Crocs Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Crocs and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
