Reviewing Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN) and Its Competitors

Bloomin’ Brands (NASDAQ: BLMN) is one of 44 public companies in the “Restaurants & Bars” industry, but how does it weigh in compared to its rivals? We will compare Bloomin’ Brands to related businesses based on the strength of its risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Bloomin’ Brands and its rivals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bloomin’ Brands 1 7 1 0 2.00
Bloomin’ Brands Competitors 272 1551 2144 73 2.50

Bloomin’ Brands presently has a consensus price target of $20.63, suggesting a potential upside of 19.01%. As a group, “Restaurants & Bars” companies have a potential upside of 11.28%. Given Bloomin’ Brands’ higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bloomin’ Brands is more favorable than its rivals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.0% of shares of all “Restaurants & Bars” companies are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Bloomin’ Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of shares of all “Restaurants & Bars” companies are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Bloomin’ Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Bloomin’ Brands pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. As a group, “Restaurants & Bars” companies pay a dividend yield of 3.0% and pay out 61.0% of their earnings in the form of a dividend.

Profitability

This table compares Bloomin’ Brands and its rivals’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bloomin’ Brands 2.29% 74.68% 5.48%
Bloomin’ Brands Competitors 1.77% 12.50% 1.76%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Bloomin’ Brands and its rivals revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue EBITDA Price/Earnings Ratio
Bloomin’ Brands $4.19 billion $402.41 million 19.26
Bloomin’ Brands Competitors $2.04 billion $349.24 million -4.53

Bloomin’ Brands has higher revenue and earnings than its rivals. Bloomin’ Brands is trading at a higher price-to-earnings ratio than its rivals, indicating that it is currently more expensive than other companies in its industry.

Volatility and Risk

Bloomin’ Brands has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bloomin’ Brands’ rivals have a beta of 0.67, meaning that their average share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Bloomin’ Brands beats its rivals on 8 of the 15 factors compared.

Bloomin’ Brands Company Profile

Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. is a holding company. The Company owns and operates casual, upscale casual and fine dining restaurants. The Company operates through two segments: U.S. and International. The U.S. segment includes all brands operating in the United States. The International segment includes brands operating outside the United States. As of December 25, 2016, the Company had a portfolio of four restaurant concepts: Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC (OSI) is the Company’s primary operating entity. New Private Restaurant Properties, LLC (PRP), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, leases the Company-owned restaurant properties to OSI’s subsidiaries. As of December 25, 2016, the Company owned and operated 1,276 restaurants and franchised 240 restaurants across 48 states, Puerto Rico, Guam and 20 countries.

Receive News & Ratings for Bloomin' Brands Inc. Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Bloomin' Brands Inc. and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Latest News

Leave a Reply